Number of credits available | Minimum standards |
---|---|
2 |
No |
To recognise and encourage effective measures that promote safe and secure use and access to and from the building.
The following is required to demonstrate compliance for:
Where external site areas form part of the assessed development the following apply:
Where vehicle delivery access and drop-off areas form part of the assessed development, the following apply:
None.
Ref |
Terms |
Description |
---|---|---|
Shell and core | ||
CN1 |
Applicable assessment criteria |
Both options: All criteria relevant to the building type and function apply. Refer to Appendix D – BREEAM UK New Construction and Shell and Core Project Assessments for a more detailed description of the above shell and core assessment options. |
CN1.1 |
Recommendations for speculative projects. See criteria 11-13 |
Both options: If the SQSS is unable to make complete recommendations due to the speculative nature of the assessment, then the credit may still be available. The SQSS must confirm that they have addressed all parts of the project where it is feasible to do so, based on the information available to them at the time of assessment. In relation to the influence of the occupier(s) on security, the SQSS shall clearly document their assumptions in the Security Needs Assessment. |
Simple buildings | ||
CN2 |
Applicable assessment criteria | All criteria relevant to the building type and function apply. |
General | ||
Safe access | ||
CN3 |
Development does not have any external site areas. See criteria 1 to 10. |
The safe access criteria apply only to developments that have areas external to the assessed building and within the boundary of the assessed development (regardless or not of whether that external area is or will be the responsibility of the future building occupant). This includes external parking areas. If the assessed building does not have any external areas and access to the building is direct from the public highway/footpath i.e. there is no on-site vehicle access and parking areas, then the criteria concerning safe access are not applicable. In such instances the two available credits must be assessed and awarded based on compliance with the security criteria. |
CN3.1 |
Covered parking area See criteria 1 to 10. | Where the assessed building has no external areas but does have a covered parking facility, and cyclists/pedestrians/delivery vehicles access the building via this area, then the relevant safe access criteria apply and this area must be assessed against those criteria. |
CN3.2 |
Delivery access through parking areas (smaller sites/deliveries) See criteria 1 to 10 apart from 7. |
Criterion 7 (delivery access through general parking areas) can be relaxed for smaller sites if it can be confirmed that the building is of an operational type and size which is likely to mean all deliveries to the building will be made by small vans and not heavy goods vehicles. |
CN3.3 |
No vehicle delivery and manoeuvring areas See criteria 1 to 6. |
The criteria concerning vehicle delivery access is not applicable where dedicated delivery access and drop-off areas do not form part of the assessed development. |
CN3.4 |
Dedicated footpaths from car parking spaces |
Where it is not practical to provide dedicated footpaths from each parking space within a car park, it is expected that design teams take every practical measure to ensure the safety of pedestrians. In general terms, as a minimum, a safe pedestrian route should be provided from the pedestrian exit of the car park to the building entrance. For larger car parks it would be beneficial to provide footpaths at regular intervals across it, to aid safe access from the car to the building entrance and the design team should demonstrate that they have achieved this as far as is practical. |
Security of site and building | ||
CN3.5 |
Security Needs Assessment |
Where a suitably qualified security specialist was consulted at a later stage than RIBA stage 2, this credit may still be achievable. If the suitably qualified security specialist confirms that the implementation of security measures have not been restricted, impaired or are not possible as a result of their later involvement ( i.e. everything that would/could have been recommended can still be implemented), then the credit can still be awarded (provided all other compliance requirements are met). |
Implementing recommendations or solutions See criterion 13. |
When confirming whether the recommendations or solutions set out by the suitably qualified security specialist(s) have been implemented at the post construction stage, it may be necessary for the assessor to use one or more of the following evidence types, supplied by the design team:
|
|
Building type specific | ||
CN4 |
Prisons Scope of security criteria for buildings on prison sites |
In the case of an assessment of a prison building/development the security criteria apply only to publicly accessible buildings and car parking areas outside of the secure perimeter zone (but still on the wider prison site). This could include visitor reception/waiting buildings, facilities/estates offices and storage and visitor/staff parking. Security relating to secure prison buildings and their related site layout falls outside of the scope of BREEAM. |
None.
Criteria | Interim design stage |
Final post construction stage
|
---|---|---|
All |
One or more of the appropriate evidence types listed in The BREEAM evidential requirements section can be used to demonstrate compliance with these criteria. |
The following is a list of existing schemes that may support the SQSS when developing the recommendations or solutions addressing the issues raised in the Security Needs Assessment (SNA)
*The Safer Parking Scheme is only applicable to schemes where the primary function of the site is for parking of vehicles, or to parking areas serving the prevailing site use(s).
**SABRE is currently in piloting phase, with a public launch targeted for December 2016.
The Metric Handbook2Metric handbook Planning and design data, Adler, Architectural Press 4th Edition. 2012. contains details of typical delivery/freight vehicle sizes and turning circles.
In addition to the SbD Schools guidance, Managing School Facilities, Guide 4 Improving Security in Schools, published by the Department for Education and Employment (1996)3Managing School Facilities, Guide 4 Improving Security in Schools, published by the Department for Education and Employment (1996), offers guidance on how to improve the security of school premises.
BREEAM UK New Construction non-domestic buildings technical manual 2014
Reference: SD5076 – Issue: 5.0
Date: 23/08/2016
Copyright © 2016 BRE Global. All rights reserved.