Number of credits available | Minimum standards |
---|---|
4 | Yes (criterion 1 only) |
To recognise and encourage the specification and procurement of responsibly sourced materials for key building elements.
The following is required to demonstrate compliance:
Note:
Table 43 The number of BREEAM credits achieved is determined as follows
RSM credits | % of available RSM points achieved |
---|---|
3 | ≥ 54% |
2 | ≥ 36% |
1 | ≥ 18% |
The following outlines the exemplary level criteria to achieve one innovation credit for this BREEAM issue:
None.
Ref |
Terms |
Description |
---|---|---|
Shell and core | ||
CN1 |
Applicable assessment criteria |
Both options: All criteria relevant to the building type and function apply. Refer to Appendix D – BREEAM UK New Construction and Shell and Core Project Assessments of this Scheme Document for further description of the above options. |
Simple buildings |
||
CN2 |
Applicable assessment criteria |
All criteria relevant to building type and function apply. |
General | ||
CN3 |
A government licence See criterion 1. |
A government licence, e.g. a UK Forestry Commission felling licence certificate, can be used to provide evidence of legally sourced timber but does not meet the definition of a third party timber certification scheme and so does not comply with the responsible sourcing requirements of this issue. |
CN3.1 |
Sustainable procurement plan See criterion 2. |
For design stage assessments where the principal contractor has not yet been appointed, a specification or a letter of intent from the party responsible for appointing the principal contractor must be provided confirming a requirement for the principal contractor to have in place a sustainable procurement plan. Refer to |
CN3.2 |
BREEAM recognised responsible sourcing certification schemes and their point scores See criterion 3. |
Guidance Note 18 available in the Resources section of the BREEAM website, provides a table of responsible sourcing certification schemes recognised under BREEAM, their scope and associated point scores. This table is reviewed on a regular basis and BREEAM assessors must ensure they use the current table. |
CN3.3 |
Checking responsible sourcing claims See criterion 3. |
Confirmation of manufacturers and suppliers claims should be sought from the relevant responsible sourcing scheme provider. Many of the organisations who administer RSM certification schemes will, via their website, list companies and products that have been certified against their standards, including the scope of any such certification. Some schemes, including BES 6001 via www.greenbooklive.com, will provide downloadable copies of the relevant certificate, which can in turn be used as evidence of compliance for this BREEAM issue. |
CN3.4 |
Specified reused materials See criterion 3. |
Where reused materials are specified for the project, these can be allocated ten points. |
CN3.5 |
Specified recycled materials See criterion 3. |
Where evidence can be provided that certified products used in the building contain a high proportion (≥ 90%) repurposed or recycled content , these can be allocated points as per Table -1 in Guidance Note |
Route 1 Cut- off See step 1 in the Methodology section. |
Any material type within a location/use category, other than ceiling and internal partitions/internal walls (see Table 44 ), which clearly accounts for less than 1m³ per 1000 m² of gross internal floor area, can be excluded from assessment. Fixings, adhesives, many finishing materials (but not all) and ironmongery would normally fall below this threshold. Material types within Ceiling and Internal partitions/internal walls location/use categories, which clearly account for less than 0.33m³ per 1000 m² of gross internal floor area, can be excluded from assessment. Calculations will not normally be required to justify such exclusions. |
There are two routes to demonstrate compliance with this issue. Either of the routes or a combination may be followed for any situation:
The following steps outline the methodology to be followed for this route to determine the number of credits achieved for responsible sourcing. The calculations outlined below are undertaken using the BREEAM Mat 03 calculator and the relevant project information, collated by the project team.
Identify from 'Location/use categories' list under Table 44 all location/use categories present in the building. Allocate from 'material category' list all materials that make-up each location/use category identified. Exclude all materials within a location/use category that meet the cut-off criteria set out in Mat 03 Responsible sourcing of materials.
Note:
The most appropriate category for each particular material type must be selected. Where none of the categories are appropriate use ‘other’.
Products made up of constituent materials (such as windows, doors, etc.) must be broken down into constituent materials and assessed separately following the category allocation process described above. As before, any material that falls below the cut-off threshold
Table 44 Location and use and material categories.
Location table and use categories |
---|
|
For each material type identified as applicable in step 1, determine whether or not it is covered by a BREEAM-recognised Responsible Sourcing Certification Scheme certificate (see Additional information section).
Refer to Guidance Note
Note:
1. The responsible sourcing certification scheme (RSCS) point score is determined based on the rigour of responsible sourcing demonstrated by the supplier(s) or manufacturer(s) of that material through the use of recognised responsible sourcing certification schemes.
The data entered in steps 1 and 2 is used by the BREEAM Mat 03 tool to calculate the number of RSM points achieved and award credits accordingly. This award of credits is determined as follows:
For materials that have been given the same material category (timber/timber-based product has been used to illustrate), the tool:
The above process is repeated for each material category. The results for all material categories are summed and the difference between the total and the maximum total possible expressed as a percentage. The percentage is then converted to a credit score according to the Table 43
An example calculation for route 1 is provided in Table 45 .
Table 45 Example calculation for route 1
Location/ use category |
Material category |
RSCS point score |
Average point score* |
RSM point score allocation** |
---|---|---|---|---|
Door/ window |
Timber/timber-based product 1 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
Timber/timber-based product 2 | 6 | |||
Floor | Timber/timber-based product 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Timber/timber-based product 2 | 5 | |||
External wall | Timber/timber-based product 1 | 6 | 6.5 | |
Timber/timber-based product 2 | 7 | |||
Door/ window |
Metal product 1 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
Ceiling |
Metal product 1 | 3 | 2.5 | |
Metal product 2 | 2 | |||
Structure primary and secondary | Concrete/cementitious product 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Concrete/cementitious product 2 | 2 | |||
Concrete/cementitious product 3 | 1 | |||
Internal partition | Concrete/cementitious product 1 | 4 | 5.5 | |
Concrete/cementitious product 2 | 7 | |||
Structure primary and secondary | Clay-based product 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
Clay-based product 2 | 5 | |||
Roof | Clay-based product 1 | 8 | 8 |
* Average point scores for a given material in that location/use category.
** The point score allocation is the lowest point score, rounded, in the previous column, for a given material category.
Table 46 Example point allocation and award of credits
Material category | Point scores achieved | Maximum point score | % available points achieved | Credits achieved |
---|---|---|---|---|
Timber/ timber-based product | 4 | 10 | 30% | 1 |
Metal | 2 | 10 | ||
Concrete/ cementitious | 2 | 10 | ||
Clay-based | 4 | 10 | ||
Total score | 12 | 40 |
This route allows for a more detailed calculation of the responsibly sourced materials in a building where information on material quantities are available. It follows a similar methodology to that set out for route 1 above but allows for a detailed calculation, based on the relative quantity of each material to weight the point scores, thus influencing the final result. Following route 2 leads to a more accurate final result and typically leads to a higher score. The required calculations are performed by the Mat 03 Calculator tool.
An example calculation for route 2 is provided in Table 47 . The example illustrates the calculation for a single material category (timber/ timber-based products (TBP)). This process is repeated for each material category present in the building to determine the final RSM score.
Table 47 Example calculation for single material category
Material category |
RSCS point score |
Quantity , IKg) |
Point score weighted |
Max. point score |
% total score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | (G) | |
Door/ window | |||||
Timber/ TBP 1 | 4 | 100 | 400 | 1000 |
|
Timber/ TBP 2 | 6 | 50 | 300 | 500 | |
Total Scores | (E)700 | (F)1500 | 46.7% | ||
Floor | |||||
Timber/ TBP 1 | 3 | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
|
Timber/ TBP 2 | 5 | 200 | 1000 | 2000 | |
Total Scores | (E)1300 | (F)3000 | 43.3% | ||
External wall | |||||
Timber/ TBP 1 | 6 | 300 | 1800 | 3000 |
|
Timber/ TBP 2 | 7 | 200 | 1400 | 2000 | |
Total Scores | (E)3200 | (F)5000 | 64% | ||
Average % total score (H) | 51.3% | ||||
RSM score (I) | 5.13 |
Responsible sourcing certification scheme (RSCS) point score achieved, A
Quantity (m³ , Kg), B
Point score weighted by quantity, C = responsible sourcing certification scheme (RSCS) point score achieved x quantity
C = A x B
Maximum point score weighted by quantity, D = 10 x quantity
D = 10 x B
Total score achieved, E = sum of point scores weighted by quantity
E = sum of C scores
Total maximum score, F = sum of maximum scores weighted by quantity
F = sum of D scores
Total score achieved, G = sum of point scores weighted by quantity/ sum of maximum scores weighted by quantity
G = E/ F
Average percentage, H = average of total scores achieved
H = average of G scores
RSM score achieved, I =10 x average percentage
I =10 x H
Table 48 illustrates the awarding of credits where a combination of routes is used.
In the example below route 2 has been used to calculate the points for timber/ timber-based products. For all other materials present, route 1 has been used to allocate points. The figures shown have been taken from the relevant tables under route 1 and 2 example calculations provided above.
Note: Only one route can be selected per material category.
Table 48 Example credit calculation for where a combination of routes are used
Material category | RSCS point score | Maximum point score | Percentage of available points | Credits achieved |
---|---|---|---|---|
Timber/ timber-based product (using route 2) |
5.13 | 10 | 32.83% | 1 |
Metal (using route 1) | 2 | 10 | ||
Concrete/ cementitious (using route 1) | 2 | 10 | ||
Clay-based (using route 1) | 4 | 10 | ||
Total score | 13.13 | 40 |
Criteria | Interim design stage |
Final post construction stage
|
---|---|---|
All |
See The BREEAM evidential requirements section for a list of general evidence types that can be used to demonstrate compliance with the relevant criteria for this issue. |
|
All | Completed copy of the Mat 03 Calculator tool | As per interim design stage. |
All | Documentary evidence detailing how the Calculator tool has been completed. | As per interim design stage. |
This is a BRE Global standard that provides a framework for the assessment and certification of the responsible sourcing of construction products. The Standard has been structured so that compliance can be demonstrated through a combination of meeting the requirements of other recognised certification schemes, establishing written policies, setting objectives and targets and engaging with relevant stakeholders.
To comply with the standard a product must meet a number of mandatory criteria. Where a product demonstrates compliance beyond the mandatory levels, higher levels of performance can be achieved. The standard's performance ratings range from Pass to Good, Very Good and Excellent.
The development of this standard and subsequent certification schemes will, it is envisaged, provide construction products, not wholly covered under current recognised standards, a means for demonstrating their responsibly sourced credentials. In turn this will allow clients, developers and design teams to specify responsibly sourced construction products with greater assurance and provide a means of demonstrating compliance with the assessment criteria for this BREEAM issue.
To view a list of products approved to BES 6001 and additional information about the standard visit: www.greenbooklive.com.
A CPET document may be helpful to assessors with respect to determining the validity of FSC and PEFC certificates. See www.cpet.org.uk.
BREEAM UK New Construction non-domestic buildings technical manual 2014
Reference: SD5076 – Issue: 5.0
Date: 23/08/2016
Copyright © 2016 BRE Global. All rights reserved.