| Number of credits available | Minimum standards |
|---|---|
| 4 | No |
To deliver whole life value by encouraging the use of life cycle costing to improve design, specification, through-life maintenance and operation, and through the dissemination of capital cost reporting to promote economic sustainability.
This issue is split into three parts:
The following is required to demonstrate compliance:
| 1 | An outline, entire asset elemental LCCLife Cycle Cost plan has been carried out at the Concept Design stage together with any design option appraisals in line with 'Buildings and constructed assets – Service life planning – Part 5: Life cycle costing ISO 15686-5:20081ISO 15686-5:2008. Buildings and constructed assets. Service life planning - Part 5: Life cycle costing.. |
| 2 | The outline LCC plan: |
| 2.a | Provides an indication of future replacement costs over a period of analysis as required by the client (e.g. 20, 30, 50 or 60 years) |
| 2.b | Includes service life, maintenance and operation cost estimates. |
| 4.a | Envelope, e.g. cladding, windows, or roofing |
| 4.b | Services, e.g. heat source, cooling source or controls |
| 4.c | Finishes, e.g. walls, floors or ceilings |
| 4.d | External spaces, e.g. alternative hard landscaping, boundary protection. |
| 6 | Report the capital cost for the building , via the BREEAM Assessment Scoring and Reporting tool. |
None.
| Ref | Terms | Description |
|---|---|---|
Shell and core (non-residential and residential institutions only) | ||
CN1 | Applicable assessment criteria | Elemental life cycle cost, capital cost reporting and maintenance strategy, criteria 1 to 3 and 6 Both options: All assessment criteria relevant to the building type and function apply. Component level LCC plan, criteria 4 to 5 Both options: The plan must include all component types to be installed by the developer. Refer to Appendix D – Shell and core project assessments for a more detailed description of the shell and core assessment options. |
Residential - Partially fitted and fully fitted | ||
CN2 | Applicable assessment criteria - Single and multiple dwellings | Both options: All criteria relevant to the building type and function apply. Refer to Appendix E – Applicability of BREEAM New Construction to single and multiple dwellings, partially and fully fitted for a more detailed description of residential assessment options. |
General | ||
CN3 | Appropriate examples See criterion 3 . | The options selected to demonstrate how life cycle costs have been minimised and critical value maximised must be appropriate in terms of their relative impact on project costs, future building maintenance burden and size (volume or area) and the stage of the project. At stage 2, when considering the outputs from the elemental LCC plan, examples could be in the form of elemental appraisals (where appropriate), evolutions in concept design to reduce maintenance or replacement costs or contracts for further elemental analysis. At stage 4, when considering the outputs from the component level options analysis, examples are likely to be in the form of component specifications coupled with justifications for their selection (i.e. how they reduce life cycle costs and maximise critical value). |
CN3.1 | Predefined specifications | Where the building is constructed to a predefined standard specification, the LCC elemental plan for this specification may be used to help demonstrate compliance. |
CN3.2 | Capital cost reporting final information not available | At the design stage of assessment, where the final information is not available, the credit can be awarded where the client provides the predicted capital cost, including contingencies, and commits to providing this information for the final stage of assessment. At the final stage, if the final capital cost is not known, the client's or cost consultant's best estimate should be provided. This data will be used to inform future BREEAM performance benchmarking and will be anonymised. |
CN3.3 | Independent assessment of parts | All three parts can be awarded independently from one another. For example, the project team can still target the one credit for the component level LCC option appraisal at stage 4 even if they have not been awarded the first two credits at stage 2 for developing an elemental life cycle cost plan. The capital cost reporting credit can also be awarded independently from the other two parts. |
CN3.4 | Component level LCC options appraisal – assessing types 4.a–4.d | The component level LCC options appraisal should review all of the component types listed, 4.a–4.d (where present). However not every single example cited under each component need be considered; only a selection of those most likely to draw valued comparisons. This is to ensure that a wide range of options are considered and help focus the analysis on components which would benefit the most from appraisal. |
CN3.5 | Elemental LCC plan study period | The study period should ideally be agreed by the client, in line with the design life expectancy of the building. However, where the life expectancy of the building has not yet been formally agreed (due to the early stages of the design process), the default design life of 60 years should be used for modelling purposes. |
None.
| Criteria | Interim design stage | Final post-construction stage |
|---|---|---|
| 1–3 | Elemental LCC plan. | As per interim design stage. |
| 4–5 | Component level LCC options appraisal. | As per interim design stage. |
| 6 | Predicted capital costs via the BREEAM scoring and reporting tool. | Capital costs via the BREEAM scoring and reporting tool. |
BREEAM International New Construction 2016
Reference: SD233 – Issue: 2.0
Date: 03/07/2017
Copyright © 2017 BRE Global. All rights reserved.